<![CDATA[iRedMail — Phamm instead of phpLDAPadmin]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic86-phamm-instead-of-phpldapadmin.html Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:40:38 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Phamm instead of phpLDAPadmin]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post418.html#p418 No roadmap yet.
Hope there will be a first release in Aug or Sep.

]]> Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:40:38 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post418.html#p418 <![CDATA[Re: Phamm instead of phpLDAPadmin]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post417.html#p417 This is great news, I've been wanting to migrate my mysql based MX to LDAP for a long time now, I hope this would be integrated soon, will this be part of the stable 0.5 series?

]]> Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:38:45 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post417.html#p417 <![CDATA[Re: Phamm instead of phpLDAPadmin]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post415.html#p415 No plan to use Phamm.
It uses its own LDAP schema which is different with iRedMail ldap schema.

We are developing our own web-based admin console, used to manage LDAP mail users.

Screenshot of DRAFT version:

http://www.iredmail.org/bbs/attachments/month_0906/20090605_9242d19acdfd071f896cQ9zKT7DkodWR.png

]]> Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:35:09 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post415.html#p415 <![CDATA[Phamm instead of phpLDAPadmin]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post414.html#p414 I was wondering if iRedMail plan to incorporate Phamm and use it instead of phpLdapAdmin, I think it's more easy to use than PLA.

]]> Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:46:47 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post414.html#p414