<![CDATA[iRedMail — Fail2ban on Port 587]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic4466-fail2ban-on-port-587.html Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:50:55 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: Fail2ban on Port 587]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post20332.html#p20332 Understood, thanks!

]]> Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:50:55 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post20332.html#p20332 <![CDATA[Re: Fail2ban on Port 587]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post20320.html#p20320 Fail2ban monitors log files, not port.

]]> Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:43:56 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post20320.html#p20320 <![CDATA[Fail2ban on Port 587]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post20317.html#p20317 ==== Required information ====
- iRedMail version: 0.8.3
- Store mail accounts in which backend (LDAP/MySQL/PGSQL): LDAP
- Linux/BSD distribution name and version: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
- Related log if you're reporting an issue:
====

HI All,

Quick question on whether I have to configure Fail2ban to monitor Port 587. Should I add the value '587' to the Postfix section of Jail.local? Or does the value 'smtp' already cover it?

Snippet from Jail.local:
action = iptables-multiport[name=postfix, port="http,https,smtp,submission,pop3,pop3s,imap,imaps,sieve", protocol=tcp]

Thanks!

]]> Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:38:06 +0000 http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post20317.html#p20317