<![CDATA[iRedMail — Mysql o Ldap for more 1600 users]]> 2009-09-21T18:00:41Z PunBB http://www.iredmail.org/forum/topic249-mysql-o-ldap-for-more-1600-users.html <![CDATA[Re: Mysql o Ldap for more 1600 users]]> shake wrote:

I think the user mailbox can put in share storage.

   
as I do

sad

]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/user264.html 2009-09-21T18:00:41Z http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post1193.html#p1193 <![CDATA[Re: Mysql o Ldap for more 1600 users]]> yrjc2004 wrote:
ZhangHuangbin wrote:

LDAP is easier for CLUSTER with its replication.

You've tried to make a cluster? How to share user mailbox.

I think the user mailbox can put in share storage.

]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/user3.html 2009-09-18T06:37:41Z http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post1175.html#p1175 <![CDATA[Re: Mysql o Ldap for more 1600 users]]> ZhangHuangbin wrote:

LDAP is easier for CLUSTER with its replication.

You've tried to make a cluster? How to share user mailbox.

]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/user264.html 2009-09-14T12:15:11Z http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post1154.html#p1154 <![CDATA[Re: Mysql o Ldap for more 1600 users]]> LDAP is easier for CLUSTER with its replication.

]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/user2.html 2009-09-14T02:05:57Z http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post1151.html#p1151 <![CDATA[Mysql o Ldap for more 1600 users]]> hello I recommend using about 1600 for mysql or ldap users and is there any way of achieving a cluster between 2 servers iredmail

]]> http://www.iredmail.org/forum/user264.html 2009-09-13T18:54:50Z http://www.iredmail.org/forum/post1147.html#p1147